|
Post by josef on Sept 24, 2024 21:42:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Country Joe on Sept 24, 2024 22:27:22 GMT
That is really interesting. I don’t think it’s worth the effort but it is cool.
|
|
|
Post by josef on Sept 24, 2024 22:30:40 GMT
That is really interesting. I don’t think it’s worth the effort but it is cool. I agree. Interesting is about as far as it goes.
|
|
|
Post by af3020 on Sept 25, 2024 0:47:28 GMT
I guess it is a tad better than an electric dog polisher or a gasoline powered turtle neck sweater...but not by much.
|
|
|
Post by firewood on Sept 25, 2024 2:25:09 GMT
That’s interesting for sure - seems a little redundant when you don’t have a remote control winder too… 😜 On the subject of oddball control systems, I once saw a neat method of remote control on a live steam locomotive. It was fitted with insulated wheels just like 2-rail models, and had a motor-driven throttle. The motor-throttle was operated by 12v power from a handheld rocker switch connected to the rails and was combined with a reversing valve. The cylinders had piston valves. (Steam steering engines on old steamships were similarly run) Dave
|
|
|
Post by steveoncattailcreek on Sept 25, 2024 3:19:28 GMT
Oh, c'mon, people, I think you're missing the point.
Obviously, a remote control on a clockwork train is not an exercise in practical functionality or advancing the state of the art of model railroading, but IMHO is instead just intended as a folly -- a project undertaken *precisely because* of its absurdity or impracticality. Just to state the concept is nearly enough to blow one's mind, and to actually bring the concept into being IMHO puts the project more in the category of mechanical artwork than a typical model railroading build. Critiquing it as if it were just another modification is sorta like someone actually building one of Escher's staircases and others complaining it wasn't carpeted or painted properly -- perhaps literally true, but beside the point IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by redjimmy1955 on Sept 25, 2024 11:30:06 GMT
Found this interesting, and right in line with an idea I have for adding motors and remote control to Mrs Red Jimmys' three kings on camels statues. I would run all three statues like BattleBots! In all seriousness, I give kudos to the innovator that made these engines remote control. Well worth the effort because he learned something by doing it!
|
|
|
Post by steveoncattailcreek on Sept 25, 2024 15:12:49 GMT
Found this interesting, and right in line with an idea I have for adding motors and remote control to Mrs Red Jimmys' three kings on camels statues. I would run all three statues like BattleBots! Don't forget the flame throwers!
|
|
|
Post by healey36 on Sept 25, 2024 15:29:51 GMT
To some extent, it's tech for tech's sake, but then the ability to stop the clockwork motor without physically having to grab it is a worthwhile feature. It's interesting, and while I wouldn't invest the time/effort to replicate it on clockwork, one can envision other applications.
|
|
|
Post by david1 on Sept 25, 2024 16:20:50 GMT
Its not something I would do for any reason!! The big question is WHY!!!! I had Marx trains many years ago and I really liked them but lets be honest, they were cheap junk. I know I had alot of them. Seems like its a waste of more time then its worth!!
Dave
|
|
|
Post by steveoncattailcreek on Sept 25, 2024 16:48:29 GMT
Its not something I would do for any reason!! The big question is WHY!!!! I had Marx trains many years ago and I really liked them but lets be honest, they were cheap junk. I know I had alot of them. Seems like its a waste of more time then its worth!! Hey, now you've left off preachin' and gone to meddlin'!! Seriously, though, Marx did offer a lot of low end stuff -- sort of the Menards of its day -- but what they offered was generally of decent quality and excellent value, and while a lot of high-tech stuff offered over the years by the high-end big names is now left mouldering in the junk pile for want of parts, the Marx stuff is generally easily repairable by the average hobbyist. You can argue the wisdom of adding remote control to a clockwork engine if you like, but generically casting a manufacturer as making only "cheap junk" is not only untrue, it's offensive to the many of us who have appreciated it for decades, and still do.
|
|
|
Post by healey36 on Sept 25, 2024 22:05:21 GMT
My first set was a Marx clockwork, so fond memories of good times on the floor of my room when I was a kid. Received a second-hand Flyer Mountaineer set shortly thereafter, but still remember that wind-up.
|
|
|
Post by BobS2056 on Sept 26, 2024 2:41:42 GMT
Really interesting for me and cool project
Bob
|
|
|
Post by mrmeep on Sept 28, 2024 19:58:23 GMT
On the subject of "cheap junk" .... First of all, Louis Marx was a TOY MAKER as well as a train maker. (And BTW, they were very good friends!) Second, Marx toys were meant for FUN! But they were AFFORDABLE (unlike most of today's model trains). My childhood set (vintage 1954 and STILL going strong!) was LESS THAN THE SAME (1954) COST OF A SINGLE LIONEL or AMERICAN FLYER CAR! I know this because I also have my first Lionel set (vintage 1956). Third, they got MANY of us started in this wonderful hobby. And last but NOT least, Marx made some VERY NICE higher end trains both before and after WW2 that lasted well into the 1950s. And ALSO it is a MARX (not any other brand!) locomotive that enjoys the LONGEST RUNNING PRODUCTION of a single locomotive. Beginning with Marx before WW2, then being produced by several other manufacturers after Marx closed down and the tooling was sold. Atlas being one of them. There was an article done about this in one of the TCA mags and also in Classic Toy Trains years ago. Many Marx accessories became part of many other brands' layouts. (Floodlight towers, bridges, signs, signal bridges and even some tinplate buildings and tunnels). Enclosed are some images of some of that "cheap junk". (Die cast locos, scale detailed cars, etc.) PS ... Don't forget to click the image to enlarge it for better viewing
|
|
|
Post by mrmeep on Sept 28, 2024 20:06:31 GMT
Here is a picture of my 1954 Marx "cheap junk" windup set. Still going as good as the day it was given to me (Christmas 1954). Nice to be able to run trains during a storm/power outage LOL! click on images to enlargeAttachments:
|
|